IJM on the Streets — Nantes: The Book

Empty Cafés Richard espresso cup on a café table in Nantes — Nikon FE, Rollei RPX 400
The thesis — Nikon FE, Rollei RPX 400, Nantes, February 2026

I have written a book. These things happen.

It started, as most of my trouble does, with sitting down. Ten years of parking at the Feydeau car park, walking into town not especially fast, finding a bench or a terrace table or a warm rock at the Jardin Extraordinaire, and staying there while the city got on with its afternoon. Somewhere along the way I noticed that this was not a failure to do street photography properly. It was the method. The book makes the argument at full length: the best street photographs come not from hunting but from inhabiting. Find the spot. Sit down. Let the place come to you.

IJM on the Streets — Nantes is nine chapters and a decade of film. The Bouffay at night on HP5+, squinting and hoping at 1/15th of a second. The empty Cafés Richard espresso cup that turned out to be the whole thesis. The café above the weir at the Chaussée des Moines, where the cake had absolutely nothing to do with how fondly I remember the day, or so I keep telling myself. Two seasons at the Jardin Extraordinaire. The year I refused to photograph the cathedral until the banners came down. And the Île de Nantes in 2016, with Kate, aged seven, and her Olympus Trip 35 — her photos turned out better than just fine, and it is all on record now.

Regular readers will recognise some of these days. The blog posts were the field notes; the book is what they were quietly adding up to. It is also, I should warn you, a book that contains opinions about coffee, cake, comfortable shoes, and why 36 frames are a pair of spectacles rather than a constraint. Everything was shot on film — HP5+, Pan 100, Kentmere 400, RPX 400, APX 100 — and developed in my kitchen, and the missed focus stayed in where it earned its place. The candles in the cathedral are slightly blurred. They are staying that way.

The book is available now as a PDF ebook in the shop, for the price of a few good espressos. Thirty-odd black and white photographs, ten years, one city. Free to read in any café you like.

On est bien là.

P.S. Kate has been informed that she features prominently. She has requested royalties. Negotiations continue over tea.

Why I wrote the book

People ask me, fairly regularly, where to start with film photography. Not which camera to buy — that question answers itself quickly enough — but how to actually think about it. How to stop guessing and start seeing. How to trust the process when you can’t see the results for a week.

For a long time I answered this in individual emails. Then in blog posts. Then in longer blog posts. Then in a series of posts that kept referring back to each other until I realised I wasn’t writing separate pieces at all — I was writing one thing, slowly, over several years.

That thing is now a book.

Photography from the Heart covers the ground I wish someone had covered for me when I started. Not the mechanics — the mechanics are in every manual ever printed. The thinking. How to use the exposure triangle as a creative tool rather than a technical hurdle. How to develop your own film without ruining it. How to decide what to photograph in the first place, and why that question matters more than any of the technical ones.

I’ve been shooting since the mid-1980s. I’ve used cameras that cost nothing and cameras that cost more than they should. I’ve developed film in darkrooms and my bathroom. I’ve taken photographs I’m proud of and a great many more that taught me something. This book is the distillation of all of that — not as a record of my career, but as a guide I would have found genuinely useful at the start.

It’s written the way I write here: plainly, without pretension, with the assumption that you are serious about what you’re doing and don’t need to be talked down to.

You can get it two ways. Buy it directly for 12€ — no email required, no subscription, just the book. Or get it free in exchange for your email address, and I’ll send it to you directly.

Either way, I hope it’s useful.

— Ian


Six years

This blog started in 2019. I didn’t know what it was going to be. I had photographs I wanted to write about, and thoughts about photography I wanted to test against actual words, and a vague sense that putting things down in public might make me take them more seriously.

Seven years later — over three hundred posts in — I still can’t fully explain what it is. It’s not a tutorial site, though I write about technique sometimes. It’s not a portfolio, though the photographs are here. It’s more like a notebook that got out of hand. A record of what I noticed, what I got wrong, what surprised me.

The Vendée. Nantes. A forest I keep going back to. An orchestra I’ve been photographing for three years. Cameras I’ve loved and one or two I haven’t. A book, eventually. Wrong turns that turned out to be the point.

I’m still here, still writing, still developing my own film in the kitchen. If you’ve been reading for a while, thank you — genuinely. If you’ve just found this place, the best place to start is here.

If you’d like to follow along, you can do that below. One post at a time, when it’s ready.

— Ian

Montjean-sur-Loire — The Wrong Road, the Right Place

Gear: Canon EOS 6D Mark II | 16–35mm | 24–70mm | 70–300mm | CPL filter


A Saturday afternoon in June. Montjean-sur-Loire. I was aiming for the suspension bridge in Ancenis. I missed it, found myself heading towards Angers, spotted a sign for the Loire Valley, and followed it on a whim. The Canon 6D Mark II was on the seat beside me. Sometimes that’s all you need.

I had an idea, to get in my car and drive and do some photography. It was an attempt to escape my family. I love them dearly, but sometimes you need a break. So I broke out and got in the car with my camera. Did I have any idea on where I was going? Absolutely not! As I passed the junctions I crossed out the ideas in my head; First Clisson, then Nantes, oh bugger this was going to be long. I remember seeing a photo of the suspension bridge in Ancenis and thought that could do me nicely. It would have done but I didn’t see it and then I found myself on the road to Angers. I could do that… Little did I know that I wouldn’t get there… Ah well. It wouldn’t be the first time. I saw a sign saying the road that follows the Loire Valley. I thought I’d give it a go. I ended up in a place called Montjean sur Loire. You’re not going to believe this, but the huge river I could see was wider even than the Humber, or so it seemed. I had once seen the Loire before as a boy and later as a grown man, but never like this. As a boy it had been a place we drove along whilst going to the Vendée in 1980. As a man I had been next to the Loire and saw it as this massive river meandering along before it got to Nantes, and then went towards St Nazaire. I had read about Huckleberry Finn and his journey along the river. That’s the feeling I had when I parked up on the quayside, minus Mark Twain. There were massive sand banks and islands on the river. The water was so clear, and I saw a fish jumping. I also saw the fry swimming under the boats. I got out of the car and started looking for compositions. After exploring the quayside I decided it was time for a beer. It’s beer o’clock somewhere in the world. I had a 0% beer. What a wonderful idea. There was a poster for a brass band concert for the 4th and 5th of July and it would be performed by the band that Hervé tried to get me interested in… A reason to go back? I found a typical street photography shot. Using the bars of the terrasse to frame my subject.

I looked at the bridge and tried to find a half decent composition. So I did the usual thing. Going around the sides of the bridge, looking towards where I had come from when arriving in town. “Always look behind you.” I wanted the geometry of the bridge and played with the shapes it provided. I wasn’t going to get the dramatic shadows. By the time I got back to the car, I was ready to go home. Back in the car, music on and through the Mauges towards Cholet then, back into Vendée. It was a long afternoon but a good one.

La Rabatelière: Month of Our Lady

Canon AE1 Program | Fomapan 100


If you’ve read the Lourdes articles, you’ll know that I have a particular devotion to Our Lady and to the sites of her apparitions. So when May 1st came around — the first day of the Month of Our Lady — it seemed only right to do something about it.

Out with the Canon AE1 Program, loaded with a roll of Fomapan 100. Destination: La Rabatelière, about twenty minutes from the house, and the Sanctuaire de la Salette.

I said my Rosary in the car on the way over. Stopped off at the Parish Church of Saint-Charles and said an extra decade. Well, it’s the Month of Mary. Start as you mean to go on.

The French say: En avril, ne te découvre pas d’un fil. Don’t shed a thread of clothing in April. It was May now and 26°c. The Panama hat was already feeling like too much. Shirt sleeves it was.


I’ve been to La Rabatelière before, about twenty years ago, but I hadn’t really taken it in properly. This time I wanted to do it right.

The Parish Church of Saint-Charles is where you begin. It was built in 1633, consecrated the following year on the feast of Saint Charles; that coincidence of date gave the church its name and its patron. A solid, unshowy building — what the heritage plaques call style bas-breton: a massive façade, plain and purposeful. Exactly the kind of church that says: we are here, and we intend to stay.

Except, of course, they tried to burn it down.

On 8 December 1793, during the War of the Vendée, Republican forces put the church to the torch. For those who don’t know the War of the Vendée: it was the uprising of the western provinces against the Revolution, and the Republic’s response was one of the darkest episodes in French history. The colonnes infernales — the Infernal Columns — swept through this region killing civilians, burning farms, destroying everything they found. Here in the Vendée, people carry a devoir de mémoire, a duty of remembrance. They do not forget.

The church was restored in 1802. A century later, Abbé Hillairet enlarged it; he added a transept to give it the shape of a Latin cross.

Then, in 1905, came the Law on the Separation of Church and State. All Church property was to be inventoried by the state. For a lot of French Catholics, this was not a bureaucratic inconvenience. It was another assault. The Revolution had burned the church down. Now the Republic wanted a list of everything inside it.

In February 1906, word went around La Rabatelière that the inspectors were coming. The parishioners didn’t wait. They dragged tree trunks in front of the doors. When the inspectors arrived, they found the church barricaded and the congregation inside with their priest, refusing to move.

It held. For a while.

On 23 November 1906, they came back with axes. The left side door — the one on the north side of the nave — was broken open. You can still see the marks. Deep ones. Not the kind of thing that weathers away or gets sanded smooth. They are still there because nobody has chosen to remove them. La porte des Inventaires. That is what the door has been called ever since. The Inventory Door. Not a nickname that flatters the Republic.

I stood in front of it and thought: a hundred and twenty years, and there are the marks. The Vendée does not forget. It does not perform forgetting either.


Before heading up the hill I walked through the cemetery, which the municipal council reorganised around 1970. Near the entrance sits a small millstone, on display. It was found in a tomb believed to belong to François Suire (1753-1794): a miller, killed by Republican soldiers during the War of the Vendée. Forty-one years old. Nobody famous. No monument beyond this stone. But there it is. Still there.

Near the central cross is the granite tomb of Abbé Elie Hillairet (1840-1908), the parish priest here from 1873 until his death. He is, as we’ll see, the man behind most of what you can still see in this village. It seems fitting that he is buried at the foot of his life’s work.


Then the climb.

The Sanctuaire de la Salette sits on a hillside above the Petite Maine river, and I can confirm: it is a bit hilly. There were signs for the handicapped route but I couldn’t make head nor tail of them. My legs were killing me by the time I reached the top.

For those who are less familiar with the apparitions of Our Lady: La Salette is one of the great Marian apparitions, confirmed by the Church in 1851. On 19 September 1846, on a mountainside near Corps in the French Alps, two young shepherds encountered a weeping woman seated on a stone. Her name: Mélanie Calvat, aged fourteen; and Maximin Giraud, aged eleven. The woman rose and spoke to them: about faith, about the breaking of Sunday rest, about blasphemy, about a people drifting from God. She gave each child a secret. Then she ascended into the light and was gone.

As apparitions go, La Salette has always struck me as a sorrowful one. Our Lady of Lourdes is serene; you see her in her grotto and feel peace. Our Lady of La Salette is weeping. She comes as a mother at the end of her patience, and her message is a warning. But it is still love. Only love would bother.

Hillairet understood this. He was curé here from 1873 to 1908, and he built this sanctuary as an act of deliberate faith during the most aggressively anticlerical period in French history. The Republic was dismantling the Church’s presence everywhere it could reach. Hillairet planted statues on a hillside.

Work began in 1887. Three groups of statues marking the three moments of the apparition were inaugurated the following summer. A Rosary monument came next. The path climbs to a tower: the Triumph of the Cross. At the summit, the Chapel of the Cross of Jerusalem, a square keep in local schist and brick, built in 1893. A Stations of the Cross path added along the hillside in 1902.

Standing up there, looking out over the valley, I thought about the miller buried down in the cemetery. And the axe marks in the church door. And Hillairet up here, building all of this in the teeth of a state that wanted nothing to do with it.

The Vendée has its wounds. It tends them carefully.


I am officially knackered. The Fomapan went through fine. The Panama hat stayed in the bag.

I drove home with the windows down, thinking that May 1st had been rather well spent.


All photographs shot on Fomapan 100, Canon AE1 Program. La Rabatelière, Vendée, May 2026.

Olympus Trip 35 Review: Still Worth Shooting in 2026?


The Olympus Trip 35 is one of the most loved film cameras ever made, and mine sat on a shelf for years before I got round to using it properly. Over ten million were made between 1967 and 1984, and people are still shooting them today. Here’s what it’s actually like to use one, from someone who finally took his off the shelf.


The one that sat on the shelf

I’ll be straight with you, Dear Reader. My Trip 35 has been sitting on the shelf for longer than I’d care to admit. It’s one of those cameras you pick up, think “I really must use this more,” and put back down in favour of whatever’s currently calling to you. In my case that’s usually the Pentax ME Super or the Mamiya C220, neither of which fits in a coat pocket, which is rather the point of the Trip.

So on a Sunday morning in late April I loaded a roll of expired Ilford FP4 (2013 vintage, shot at 64 ASA) and drove out towards Remouillé and Viellevigne. A route I used to cycle twenty years ago. Past the tree I was going to work on at Le Moulin du Patis, then right towards La Planche, and eventually down to a fishing lake on the road back. I wanted reflections. Mostly I just needed to get out of the house.

The Trip 35 came with me. The X100F stayed in the bag.


What is the Olympus Trip 35?

The Trip 35 was built to be the camera you take on holiday, hence the name. Launched in 1967, it was Olympus’s answer to a simple question: what if a camera just worked, without you having to think about it?

The answer was a 40mm f/2.8 D.Zuiko lens, a selenium cell light meter that needs no batteries at all, and a fully automatic exposure system with exactly two shutter speeds: 1/40s or 1/200s. That’s it. You focus using zone symbols on the lens barrel, a portrait head, a small group, a mountain, and the camera takes care of the rest.

If there isn’t enough light, a small red flag pops up in the viewfinder to warn you before you press the shutter. It won’t fire (well, it will, but only on manual override). It’s the camera’s polite way of telling you: not today.


The lens

The 40mm D.Zuiko is genuinely excellent. Sharp across the frame, renders colours well, and sits at a focal length that’s just wide enough for street work without feeling uncomfortable. It splits the difference between the classic 35mm and 50mm and, in practice, that in-between length feels right for everyday shooting.

David Bailey used a Trip 35 for his street work in the 1960s and ’70s, which tells you what the lens can do in the right hands. I make no such claims about my own hands, but the camera certainly isn’t the limiting factor.


Out in the field

I shot mostly on the mountain zone setting, dropping to the group symbol for closer subjects. The shutter feels dainty, that’s the only word for it, a light, almost apologetic click compared to the satisfying thunk of a proper SLR. The whole camera feels absurdly light. After years of carrying the Mamiya C220 around, it’s almost disconcerting.

I could hear crows. The faint sound of distant cars. Sunlight sparkling on the lake. I found myself thinking about a similar morning walking round a lake in China, and a series I shot in May on the X100F. Photography as therapy, not portfolio shots. I knew that going in, and it didn’t matter. Sometimes you just need to be still with something.

Zone focus takes a moment to get used to if you’re coming from a rangefinder or autofocus, but once it’s in your muscle memory it’s faster than it sounds. Mountain for landscapes and the lake. Group for anything closer. The camera does the rest.

The automatic exposure handles most situations well. Where it struggles is high contrast: bright sky, dark water, that sort of thing, where any automatic system is going to make compromises. But for even light and open countryside it’s excellent. You point, you shoot, you trust it.


The selenium meter: check this before you buy

Here’s the practical bit. The Trip 35’s selenium meter needs no batteries, which is one of its best features. But selenium cells degrade with age, and a meter that worked fine in 1975 might not be accurate in 2026.

Test the meter before you buy. Point the camera at a bright scene and check the aperture ring moves in response to the light. If it doesn’t move, or moves sluggishly, the meter’s on its way out. A dead meter doesn’t make the camera useless, you can shoot manual using the Sunny 16 rule, but it takes away one of the Trip’s main advantages.

Good copies are still out there, though prices have gone up as film photography’s popularity has grown. Based on current listings, budget somewhere between 70 and 135 euros for a solid working copy: basic tested examples start around 60 to 80 euros, good condition cameras sit at 100 to 135, and mint examples from Japan (plus shipping) push higher still. Parts-only cameras go for 40 to 60 euros if you’re handy and want a project. Recently serviced copies with new seals and leather cost more but save you a CLA down the line. Test the meter regardless.


Film choices

The Trip 35’s automatic system works best in good light. I shot expired Ilford FP4 (2013) rated at 64 ASA, developed in R09 at box speed, the slight overexposure compensating for twelve years of aging. Black and white suits this camera. The rendering feels right for country lanes and lake reflections. For colour, Kodak Gold 200 is a natural pairing on sunny days. Ilford HP5 pushed to 800 if you need to work in lower light.

There’s a flash sync socket too, so you can push into lower light with a small flash unit if you want. But honestly, the Trip 35 is happiest in daylight. It’s a holiday camera at heart, even if you’re using it to document a Tuesday afternoon in Nantes.


Is it still worth shooting in 2026?

Yes, unreservedly. The Trip 35 strips friction out of the act of photography. You don’t think about exposure. You don’t carry a bag of accessories. You don’t worry about battery life. You load a roll, go outside, and shoot.

That simplicity is the whole point, not something you put up with. Some of my favourite shots from the last few years have come from cameras like this, where not overthinking it produced something more spontaneous and more honest than anything I might have got with a more involved setup.

The shelf it was sitting on was my mistake. Not the camera’s.


Quick reference

  • Lens: 40mm f/2.8 D.Zuiko (6 elements, 4 groups)
  • Shutter speeds: 1/40s and 1/200s (automatic)
  • Focus: Zone focus (1m, 1.5m, 3m, infinity)
  • Meter: Selenium cell, no batteries required
  • Film: 35mm, any ISO (set via ASA dial: 25 to 400)
  • Produced: 1967 to 1984
  • Second-hand price: roughly 70 to 135 euros (working, good condition)
  • Best for: Street photography, travel, everyday carry

If you enjoyed this, you might also like my reviews of the Olympus Pen EE-S and the Pentax ME Super, two cameras that share the same spirit of getting out of the way and letting you photograph.

Half Deaf in the Forêt de Grasla

The roll started at the Jardin Extraordinaire. It finished here.

I’d loaded the Pentax ME Super with 100 ASA and put on the 50mm f/1.7: a classic pairing, and I wanted that creamy bokeh you get wide open on a prime. The Jardin gave me the first half of the roll. The Forêt de Grasla got the rest.

It’s not far. That was part of the appeal. Staying local, keeping it simple.

The forest is loud in late April. Birdsong, yes; but mostly frogs. Excitable ones. Small things, but what a noise. Good job that I’m half deaf. I found a picnic table, sat down to write, and a wolf spider walked along the wood beside me, not paying any attention whatsoever. I approved of that. The mosquitoes were less indifferent: there was one with designs on me, and I kept my eyes peeled.

I wanted tree shots, and the forest had those. It also had toads, which I hadn’t expected. The latter end of April means the canopy is full, the undergrowth is thick, and everything is moving. In that kind of light, in that kind of density, I dropped the aperture: nothing above f/8.0. Wide open would have been chaos. The forest rewards patience and a stopped-down lens.

There’s a memorial at the edge of the wood: a granite cross, a Madonna behind ironwork, and a bronze plaque to Charette and the parishioners of Grasla massacred for their faith. The Vendée is that kind of place. History sits quietly in the trees.

I still had the Panama on. Still keeping the sun off my head.

All photographs shot on 100 ASA, Pentax ME Super, 50mm f/1.7. Forêt de Grasla, April 2026.

P.S. The frogs were still going when I left.

On Est Bien Là: Back at the Jardin Extraordinaire

I said I’d come back with the Kodak Ultramax 400. Instead I’m here with a Canon EOS 500 and a roll of AGFA APX 100. These things happen. This was the second time. Time to come back after my first visit.

It’s a warm Sunday in April and the Jardin is busy. Free to enter, free to stay; and people do. Blue sky, green everywhere, the sound of the waterfall carrying up from below. Two mothers nearby are talking about their children and about wishing they had more time to themselves. A group is eating at a table. Kids are in the sun. People are stretched out on the lawns.

I think: how lucky I am to have this time off. I mean it.

I find a spot at the rock climbing end of the park. There are people with helmets: cycling or climbing, I genuinely can’t tell from here. A little girl tugs at her mother’s arm: “Aller Maman, on va ailleurs?” She wants the paddling pool. They move on. Three friends arrive and settle at the table beside me, look around at the afternoon, and one of them says it out loud: “Ok est bien hein.” “Oui.” I agree, though nobody asked me.

I’m back in this spot with the Canon EOS 500. Last time it was the Nikon FE and Ilford Pan 100: a morning visit, birdsong, quieter. The EOS 500 is a different kind of company. It’s light, unobtrusive, asks very little of you; autofocus, auto-exposure, just gets on with it. For someone who’s spent years with a digital body, it eases you in rather than throwing you in at the deep end. You still get the 36 frames, the awareness of what each one costs, the not-knowing-until-the-scans-arrive. But you’re not also wrestling with a new instrument at the same time. It’s a gentle way back into film. I liked it.

The difference today is the 24–70mm, which I’m working through properly: 24, 35, 50, 70, and trying the macro too. It changes how you read the place; you reach into corners of the scene you’d otherwise just glance past. I’ve gone through the roll much faster than expected. The zoom will do that. The AGFA APX 100 has taken it all in its stride: fine grain, happy in the light, doing exactly what a slow film should do on a day like this.

Despite the sound of children somewhere behind me, it’s the 20-somethings who dominate this end of the park: sunbathing, climbing, sitting on the old quarry rock. It’s not disturbing. If anything it’s rather nice. At the base of the face, one of the climbers looks up at the crowd gathered above and says to nobody in particular: “Ya du monde hein!” There is. I got a photograph of one of them mid-climb. Somewhere behind me, for the second time: “On est bien là!”

I wonder what they make of me. Do they know I’m a foreigner? Or am I just a rotund gentleman with a white beard and a panama hat, keeping himself to himself in the sun with an old camera?

Isn’t it just nice to be out in it.

A robin lands near my foot, thinks better of it, and disappears into the bushes. He must have been spooked. I stayed a while longer.

Nice Sunday afternoon in Nantes. Free entry.

All photographs shot on AGFA APX 100, Canon EOS 500, 24–70mm. Developed [to complete], scanned on the Opticfilm 8100. Jardin Extraordinaire, Nantes. April 2026.

P.S. The Ultramax 400 is still in the fridge. Its turn will come.

P.P.S. As a little bonus for you, I started a new roll and walked away with a few more shots….


Also in this series: Birdsong in Black & White — A Morning at the Jardin Extraordinaire

Messing about along the river in Clisson

Good morning Dear Reader, I have been out with my camera. What a surprise I hear you say. I have been missing my Canon 6D Mark II but wanted to keep using my lovely lenses. Sometimes the 50 is great, but it’s nice to break out the zoom! I have the 24-70mm EF F4 because I’m not forking out the money for the F2.8 version. But I wanted to go with film. So I did! With the Canon EOS 500 and a roll of Agfaphoto APX 400.

I parked next to the river and ended up looking up at the Castle on the hill and thinking, strangely, of a certain Mr Sheeran, but without the teen angst and drinking. I think it looks lovely. To my right was the river and the old bridge and a vantage point to look at the Sèvre Nantaise coming over the weir. I thought about the photos I’d taken in February, as well as all the others taken over the years.

I took a right at the Café des Cordeliers but instead of going along to the Garenne Lemot park, I took a left down a passage to a place I had only looked at but never visited. Today my panama hat would become my explorer’s hat and I would take a closer look. Well what a surprise it was and definitely a butcher’s.

I remember some advice given to me which is the need to turn around and look behind you and see if you’ve missed anything, and have a real look and you might even see something completely different… This time I took that advice and it was more than worth it.

I would have missed the viaduct I’d driven over before, the one that runs from Clisson towards Gétigné, which I might have to look at sometime soon. The river was reflecting light on the arches and I could have finished the roll there and I would have been happy, but I kept a couple of frames “just in case” for the walk back to the car. You never know…

I walked back to the car just looking up and seeing the laundry hanging out.  It looked like canoeing gear that was drying.  Then back across the bridge, and I was happy with the variety the 24-70mm lens gave me.  Less distortion than my 16-35mm but still enough for some variety, especially the Macro feature for the fern spores.  We can have distortion another time.

All in all a very satisfying trip out and not far away, have you seen the price of diesel lately?  Thank you Orange man!

P.S.  If you want to wean yourself off digital and get back to the street cred that comes with film the Canon EOS 500 might just be your gateway drug.  Modern enough for the new EF lenses, but still having the necessary autofocus.  You can go full manual SLR later.  Break yourself in gently…

For the people who were already here

A few months ago I finished a book. It didn’t start as a book — it started as a series of posts on this blog, one question at a time, and then became something I realised was a single argument rather than a collection of pieces. The argument is this: photography is not complicated, but it requires attention. The technique is learnable by anyone. The eye takes longer. Both are worth the effort.

The book is called Photography from the Heart. It covers the exposure triangle, composition, lenses, film formats, street photography and the full cycle — developing, scanning, printing. Not a manual. More like a long conversation with someone who has made most of the mistakes already and kept going anyway.

It’s available in the shop at 12€. But if you’re reading this here, on the blog, you were here before the book existed. You read the posts it grew from. In some ways you’re the reason it became a book at all.

Get the book →

— Ian

The Parc D’Asson

So I’ve been off work, on the sick. Part of the healing has been going out with my camera. Clisson, the Jardin Extraordinaire, but recently I started asking myself why I wasn’t looking closer to home. There’s a tendency, I think, to always seek out the dramatic or the obviously photogenic. The ruined château, the dramatic coastline, the somewhere that announces itself as worth photographing. But photography has been teaching me, slowly and not always gently, that the ordinary places are often where the real work happens.

One morning I went into Montaigu and wandered through the Parc D’Asson, the same park where I’d dropped my daughter off to meet friends. I park nearby when I go to Mass, I’d been through it once before, and somehow never properly seen it. You know how it is with places close to home. They sit in the background of your life, familiar enough that you stop registering them. Time to make amends.

It was quiet. A weekday morning, the light still low and a little uncertain, which turned out to suit what I had in mind. I’d decided to rate HP5+ at 200 ISO rather than its box speed of 400, pulling it by two stops and overexposing the film to give the negatives extra density. I’d done it by accident on a previous roll and liked what came back: a softer, more forgiving tonality than I usually get from HP5+. Less of the grain-forward contrast that pushed film is known for, more of a gentler, almost contemplative quality. So this time I did it on purpose, loaded the Nikon FE, and shot a whole roll. I’ve just developed the film and the negatives look good. Dense, as expected, with a quality of light that feels right for a quiet park on a quiet morning. There might be something there.

I’ve also been working on the Sunny 16 rule. No light meter, judging exposure by eye, the way my forefathers in photography did it. The rule itself is simple enough: in bright sunlight, set your aperture to f/16 and your shutter speed to the reciprocal of your ISO. From there you learn to read the light, to adjust by feel, to trust your eye over your electronics. I can hear you saying well, yes, the Nikon has a perfectly good meter in it. True. But there’s something valuable in the discipline of not using it. It slows you down. It makes you look harder at what the light is actually doing rather than letting the camera decide. And when you’re trying to use photography as a way back into yourself, slowing down is rather the point.

I’m getting better at reading light. Not expert, not yet, but better. The Parc D’Asson gave me good material to work with. The way the morning came through the trees, the texture of the paths, the small details that a park in winter offers if you’re patient enough to look for them. These are not grand subjects. But I’m starting to think that grand subjects are overrated.

Whether I’ve actually cracked the Sunny 16 rule, you’ll be able to judge for yourselves when I eventually share the three rolls of Tri-X I shot on the Mamiya C220 in Clisson back in February, metered entirely by phone app until I gave up on the third roll. That’s a story for another day, and probably a cautionary one. This roll, at least, I’m quietly optimistic about.

Capturing Time: A Photographic Journey Through Château de la Preuille

It was the 20th of March, the first day of spring, and I drove out to Saint-Hilaire-de-Loulay to photograph a château I’d been meaning to photograph again for some time.

Château de la Preuille has been here since the 11th century — through medieval fortress, Renaissance residence, abandonment, and whatever quiet resilience comes after that. Today it’s a living estate: chambres d’hôtes, gîtes, wine workshops, weddings. The people who run it have a motto: “It’s not perfect, it’s paradise.” Spend an afternoon there and you’ll understand why they chose it. The place has character that no amount of renovation could manufacture — it simply accumulated it, over nine centuries.

What they’ve built is worth visiting on its own terms. The accommodations range from rooms in the château itself to the old wine press building sleeping up to ten, to Le Donjon, a tower with its own private wing. The wine workshops — blind tastings, tastings under the stars — are exactly the kind of thing that sounds gimmicky until you’re actually there, on a working estate, surrounded by vines that have been cultivated on this land for generations. It’s thirty minutes from the Puy du Fou and feels like another world entirely.

I made one deliberate technical choice before I left: I pulled the HP5+ from 400 to 200 ASA. One stop of overexposure, finer grain, softer tones. For nine-hundred-year-old stone and dormant vineyards on a still March morning, it felt right. A harder, faster film would have been the wrong conversation.

What I found myself photographing wasn’t the grand architectural gestures — though the round towers with their conical slate roofs reflecting in the moat are there, and they earn their place. It was the details that kept stopping me. Wine bottles glimpsed through a window. The number 5 cast into a piece of rusty agricultural equipment. Ivy claiming the side of a wooden barn. Vine stocks twisted and patient, waiting for warmth. The decay and renewal that a place accumulates when it’s been genuinely lived in rather than merely preserved.

Black and white was the only option. Colour would have placed these images firmly in March 2026. In monochrome, they could be from any point in the château’s long life — and that ambiguity suits the subject. Preuille doesn’t perform its history. It simply has it.


Shot on Nikon FE, Ilford HP5+ pulled to 200 ASA. Home developed in Ilfosol 3 at 1:9, scanned on an Opticfilm 8100. Château de la Preuille, Saint-Hilaire-de-Loulay, Vendée. 20 March 2026. chateau-de-la-preuille.fr


Browse the full Film Archives →